For solo & small-firm litigators
Walk in knowing the record.
CasePalm reads your discovery and returns the disputed facts: what supports each one, what contradicts it, and what's missing, with citations you can open.
- Evidence branches checked per fact
- 7
- Seats free, no card
- 3
- Client files used to train outside models
- 0
Material facts
Delgado v. Lone Star Hauling
Lone Star Hauling's own ELD system flagged that the 11-hour driving limit under 49 C.F.R. §395.3(a)(3) was exceeded by 58 minutes.
Supporting evidence
The ELD record's own segment entries support the flag: driving 04:35–10:55 (6 hr 20 min) plus 12:10–17:48 (5 hr 38 min) adds up to 11 hr 58 min, which is 58 minutes over the 11-hour limit. The flag matches the underlying data.
Lone Star Hauling ELD record — Travis KempLSH-00211Contradicting testimony
Kemp testified that he started work at around 7:00–7:30 a.m. in San Antonio (MF-031). That conflicts with the ELD's 04:10 on-duty entry at the Laredo yard and its Laredo-to-San Antonio driving segment, which are the basis of the 58-minute overage.
Deposition of Travis Kemp (excerpt)
Reads the record as it arrived
- Depositions
- Discovery responses
- Medical records
- Business records
- Police reports
- Expert reports
Four hundred pages of discovery landed on Tuesday. Somewhere in them, the driver contradicts his own employer's logs. You would find it on the third read, at eleven at night. CasePalm does the first two reads and hands you the page.
Meet Aurex
It reads the record with you.
- Aurex works inside your matter. Here, the sample matter Delgado v. Lone Star Hauling.
- It reads the transcript. Travis Kemp, the driver, on how long he had been working.
- It files the answer against the record. Material fact MF-012: his own log puts him on duty 13 hours 38 minutes.
- Then it shows where the case turns. Case Strategy: the contested issue, who it favors, and where to center the argument.
- Aurex does the first read. You make the call.
Trust & confidentiality
Built for material you have a duty to protect.
Your obligations don't relax because the tool is useful. These are the guarantees the product is built around, not the ones the marketing page wishes it had.
Citation integrity
Built not to invent authority.
Findings point to the documents in your record they came from, with a pinpoint citation where the record has one. In fact analysis and Case Strategy, every citation is checked against the documents you supplied. In fact analysis, an evidence entry that points outside them is dropped; in Case Strategy, the point stays, with the citation stripped and the point flagged “Source not verified”, never passed off as sourced. The motion drafter is instructed not to supply case law: where a draft needs legal authority, it states the proposition and marks the citation for you to supply.
Every motion draft carries a note to verify before filing. The tool assists the work; you remain the attorney of record.
From a generated motion draft
Defendant's hours-of-service records were produced without a custodial affidavit and cannot be authenticated on this record. [verify authority] Plaintiff respectfully requests the Court strike the exhibit or defer ruling pending a proper foundation.
The factual assertion points to a produced document. The legal proposition is left marked for you to cite, not filled in with a case.
Your client materials are not training data
Privileged documents are encrypted in transit and at rest, and are never used to train external models. They are used only to provide the features your firm uses, and for no other purpose.
Your firm's records stay your firm's.
Ten firm roles across four permission bands. Firm isolation is enforced in the database, including through the AI surfaces.
Run it on your own AI account
Store your firm's own Anthropic key and most matter AI features run on it, under your agreement and your organization. The key is encrypted, admin-only, and never crosses into the browser.
Adverse documents treated as adversarial
In litigation, much of your record was written by the other side. Text pulled from documents is fenced, and the model is told to treat instructions embedded in an opponent's PDF as evidence, not commands.
Plans
Start free. Bring your own key and it opens all the way up.
No card to start, and no demo call standing between you and the product.
Free
The whole workspace, for a small team.
- 3 seats — you, a paralegal, and one more
- 5 GiB of matter-document storage
- 500 OCR pages per month for scanned records
- Unlimited matters, documents, calendar, tasks, time tracking, and the client portal
- Every team surface — chat, feed, help desk, directory, knowledge base
- With your own Anthropic key: 500 AI requests/hour and 5,000 OCR pages a month, the same as Premium
Premium
AI included, and room for the whole firm.
- Up to 15 seats across the firm
- 100 GiB of storage
- 5,000 OCR pages per month
- 500 AI requests/hour — no key of your own required
- The full AI set: dispute tree, proceedings, contradictions, trial artifacts, daily briefing, cross-matter assistant
- Unlimited assistant threads and bulk reclassification
Bring your own Anthropic key and the free plan unlocks the full AI set.
Most of your matter AI features run on your firm's key, so that spend is yours and the plan gate would only be protecting money you're already paying. Team-scale limits stay on the free tier — Premium is AI without a key, plus room to grow.
Common questions
The things attorneys ask first.
Is my client data used to train AI models?
No. Client materials are encrypted in transit and at rest and are never used to train external models. Documents are used only to provide the features your firm uses, and for no other purpose.
Will it invent case citations?
It is built not to. Findings point to documents in your own record. In fact analysis and Case Strategy, every citation is checked against the documents you supplied. In fact analysis, an evidence entry that points outside them is dropped; in Case Strategy, the point stays, with the citation stripped and the point flagged “Source not verified.” The motion drafter is instructed not to supply case law; it marks each authority for you to supply and carries a note to verify before filing. Check every authority before you file.
Does this replace my practice management system?
No, and it isn't trying to. CasePalm is the synthesis layer — what your record says, where it conflicts, and what to do about it before a hearing. Billing, trust accounting, and intake pipelines stay where they are. Matters, documents, calendar, tasks, and time tracking are here because the synthesis needs them, not to make you migrate.
How does it handle privilege?
Each firm's records are isolated from every other firm in the database as well as in the application, including the queries behind the AI surfaces. Client materials are never used to train external models, most matter AI features can run on your firm's own Anthropic key, and text from an opponent's documents is fenced and the model is told to treat it as evidence, not instructions. You decide what privilege protects; CasePalm keeps the material where that decision can hold.
Can I get my work back out?
Yes. Material facts and proceeding syntheses export to Word and PDF, formatted for a partner review or a mediation binder. Your documents remain your documents.
What does it cost to start?
Nothing. The free plan covers three seats with the full workspace, and signup is self-serve — no demo call. If you store your firm's own Anthropic API key, the free plan unlocks the complete AI feature set. Premium adds AI without needing your own key, plus firm-scale seats and storage.
CasePalm
Walk in knowing the record
Walk in knowing what the record actually says.
Three seats free. No card, no demo call. Bring a matter you already know well and see whether it finds what you found.